Ingredient Changes in Johnston’s Baby Lotion: 2003 vs 2023
The ingredients in my 2003 Johnston’s baby lotion vs my 2023 bottle have changed significantly due to updates in formulation driven by cost, performance, ingredient availability, and consumer preferences.
Ingredient Substitutions and Reformulations
Coconut Oil Replacement
Originally, the 2003 formula contained coconut oil directly as a key moisturizing agent. In the 2023 version, coconut oil is absent and replaced by fatty acids like myristyl myristate. This compound is essentially an ester derived from myristic acid, a fatty acid naturally present in coconut oil.
Replacing whole coconut oil with fatty acid esters allows more control over texture, absorption, and shelf life. Myristyl myristate acts as an emollient, providing smoothness and moisturizing effects similar to coconut oil.
Switch from Vegetable Glycerin (VG) to Propylene Glycol (PG)
The transition from VG to PG is notable because VG is usually cheaper and more natural. Despite this, PG offers better solubility properties. PG dissolves active ingredients effectively, improving uniformity in the lotion.
While chemically similar (both are humectants), PG also enhances skin absorption of certain ingredients. However, consumer perception has shifted, often associating PG with synthetic chemicals like antifreeze, which has affected its popularity.
BHT Replacing Xanthan Gum
In 2003, xanthan gum was used as a thickening agent. By 2023, BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) replaced it in some formulations. BHT is an antioxidant that prevents oil spoilage.
Cost reduction is likely behind this substitution. However, BHT is controversial due to health concerns, and regulatory restrictions have tightened globally.
This shift illustrates a trade-off between manufacturing cost and consumer safety marketing.
Addition of p-Anisic Acid
Newer formulations include p-anisic acid, an ingredient known for mild skin treatment benefits. It has antimicrobial properties and can enhance skin conditioning.
This addition reflects modern cosmetic trends focusing on multifunctional ingredients offering skincare beyond basic moisturization.
Reasons for Ingredient Changes
Cost and Performance Considerations
Cosmetic companies frequently adjust ingredients to balance costs and effectiveness. Ingredient prices fluctuate, so multiple recipes are common, adapting formulations as budgets and supply chains shift.
Performance improvements also drive reformulations. Manufacturers aim to satisfy consumers expecting smoother textures, enhanced absorption, and longer shelf life while remaining competitive.
Consumer Perception and Preferences
Modifications reflect evolving consumer awareness and demands. Many customers seek products with fewer ingredients or “natural” components. Ingredients like propylene glycol face criticism despite their safety due to associations with industrial chemicals.
Additionally, parabens and synthetic preservatives have faced scrutiny, prompting companies to explore alternative preservatives or reduce chemical load.
Ingredient Labeling Variability
Formulations sometimes differ in how ingredients are listed, such as “water” versus “water*.” This inconsistency could arise from proprietary severability, regional regulations, or marketing.
Such variations complicate direct comparison but do not necessarily imply ingredient alteration.
Specific Ingredient Observations and Concerns
Propylene Glycol (PG) vs Glycerin (VG)
PG and VG behave similarly as humectants and solvents. VG is a sugar alcohol derived from glycerides, considered more natural and generally less irritating. PG is synthetic but offers better solubility for actives.
The formula change prioritizes solubility and performance, though it may impact consumer perceptions negatively.
BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluene)
BHT is included as an antioxidant preservative in many older cosmetics. Despite being effective, health controversies regarding its carcinogenic potential and environmental impact have led to bans or avoidance in some markets.
Replacement of xanthan gum with BHT may have reduced costs but introduced doubts about safety.
Parabens and Preservatives
The presence of methyl-, propyl-, and butyl-paraben preservatives raises concern. Parabens have been linked to endocrine disruption in some studies, prompting backlash and reformulations in many products.
Though still legally permitted at regulated concentrations, parabens face declining consumer acceptance.
Titanium Dioxide
Titanium dioxide, now included at the end of the ingredient list, functions as a pigment and UV filter. Despite its widespread use, some studies have suggested potential carcinogenic effects when inhaled as a powder, not when applied in lotion form.
The cosmetic safety consensus holds it as safe in topical preparations, but ongoing research keeps consumer scrutiny high.
Aluminum Compounds
Aluminum-based ingredients sometimes appear in cosmetics as antiperspirants or preservatives. Concerns exist about aluminum accumulation and toxicity, though at low levels in lotions, effects remain unproven.
Including such ingredients in infant products causes caution among consumers looking for truly gentle baby care.
Other Ingredients
Carbomer serves as a thickener, while Red 33 is a synthetic dye. Choosing between functional additives or colorants reflects shifting priorities between aesthetics and health perceptions.
Notably, harmful substances such as “agent orange” derivatives have been removed over time.
Summary of Changes and Implications
- Original coconut oil replaced by fatty acid esters like myristyl myristate for better control and stability.
- VG replaced by PG due to solubility, despite higher cost and consumer skepticism of PG.
- Thickening agents shifted from xanthan gum to BHT, introducing safety concerns and regulatory changes.
- New ingredients like p-anisic acid reflect enhanced skin benefits trends.
- Ingredient swaps driven by fluctuating raw material prices, performance goals, and shifting consumer attitudes.
- Controversial preservatives like parabens remain but face decreasing acceptance.
- Inclusion of titanium dioxide and aluminum invites ongoing safety discussion.
- Labeling differences and ingredient lists demonstrate adaptation to regulatory and marketing environments.
Key Takeaways
- Johnston’s baby lotion formulations evolved mainly for cost, efficacy, and consumer preference reasons.
- Coconut oil is replaced by related fatty acids to improve formulation stability.
- Propylene glycol replaces glycerin due to better ingredient solubility but faces consumer perception challenges.
- BHT, a controversial antioxidant, replaced xanthan gum but is now less favored or banned in some areas.
- Modern formulations include ingredients for enhanced skin treatment while reducing some older preservatives.
- Concerns about parabens, titanium dioxide, and aluminum persist; however, concentrations used comply with safety regulations.
- Ingredient lists reflect evolving cosmetic industry standards balancing safety, cost, and public image.
Why was coconut oil replaced with fatty acids like myristyl myristate in the 2023 lotion?
Myristyl myristate is a fatty acid ester similar to the original coconut oil component. This change likely improves lotion texture or stability while maintaining skin benefits.
Why did Johnston’s switch from vegetable glycerin (VG) to propylene glycol (PG)?
The switch is probably due to solubility differences. Even though VG is cheaper, PG may help dissolve ingredients better or improve the lotion’s feel.
What is the reason behind replacing xanthan gum with BHT in earlier formulations?
BHT was used as a cost-saving replacement for xanthan gum. However, BHT’s safety concerns led to it being removed or banned later on.
Are the newer preservatives like parabens and titanium dioxide safe in Johnson’s baby lotion?
There are ongoing debates about parabens and titanium dioxide. They are commonly used but have raised consumer concerns about safety despite regulatory approvals.
How have consumer perceptions influenced the ingredient changes over time?
Consumers now prefer fewer ingredients and avoid chemicals like propylene glycol. This demand has pushed brands to reformulate products for safety and market appeal.
Leave a Comment